.jpg)
A friend sent me a brand campaign last week and said, "this looks like it was made in someone's bedroom, not an agency." She meant it as a compliment. And when I opened it, I understood why. Torn paper, tape marks, handwriting in the margins. It looked unfinished on purpose, and next to the smooth, AI-perfect feeds we all scroll through, it actually stood out.
Here's why I think that's happening, and what it actually means if you're building a brand right now.
For the past year, AI tools have handed us flawless logos, flawless photos, flawless everything, in seconds. I wrote about that a few weeks ago, how that speed has a real cost, and one of the biggest costs is that everything starts to look the same.
Turns out that cost caught up fast. When anyone can get a perfect result in one prompt, perfect stops meaning "well made." It starts meaning "a machine made this." So a lot of people are reaching for the opposite: rough edges, visible tape, handwriting, a photocopy texture, text that isn't lined up perfectly, on purpose.
The numbers show it. Zine and Substack-style layouts are up 85 percent in searches this year. Lo-fi style searches jumped 527 percent. Nike, Spotify, and a few fashion brands are already using torn paper and tape textures in real campaigns, not just as a one-off idea but as a real design choice. Even searches for "liminal" and "uncanny" images, things that feel a little strange, are up 220 percent.
.jpg)
Here's where I want to be careful, because I've already seen brands get this wrong.
"Imperfect by design" doesn't mean lazy. It doesn't mean skip your brand colors, skip your fonts, and throw something together at the last minute. The brands doing this well are just as careful as brands doing clean, minimal design. They just chose a different set of rules, and they follow those rules every time.
A torn edge that shows up once looks like a mistake. The same torn edge, done the same way, every time, is a decision.
That's really the whole idea. This look still needs a system behind it, which textures you use, how rough, what your "handwritten" style looks like across ten different posts instead of just one. Skip that thinking, and you don't get something real. You get something inconsistent, and inconsistent still looks unfinished. It's just unfinished in a new way.
If your industry already looks like everyone else right now, same rounded font, same gradient blue that every AI tool seems to produce, this trend is worth paying attention to. It's telling you that a real part of your audience is tired of "too perfect" and wants things that feel handmade instead.
That doesn't mean every brand should grab tape and scissors tomorrow. A bank going full zine-collage would probably hurt the trust it's trying to build. But almost any brand can borrow a small piece of this, honestly: a rougher texture in one campaign, some handwriting on part of the website, photos that aren't perfectly retouched. Small, planned imperfections, placed where they build trust instead of confusion.
The brands getting this right aren't rejecting good design. They're just changing what "good design" looks like now that everyone has the same AI tools. Perfect used to be the hard part to reach. Now the hard part is knowing exactly which imperfections to keep.
.jpg)
This trend proves the same point I keep coming back to. AI can give you endless versions of "clean." It can't tell you when messy is the right call for your brand, how messy, or where. That's still a decision only you can make.
If you're working through what your brand should actually look like, clean, raw, or somewhere in between, I built two tools that walk through exactly that: